Overview
As JNIS approaches its 10 year anniversary, there has been consistent yearly growth in the number of manuscript submissions both nationally and internationally. As such, there is a corresponding need to grow and develop the peer review process. As stated by Proto: "The quality of a scientific journal is, in a major way, a reflection of the quality and dedication of its reviewers".1 The purpose of this editorial commentary is to reinforce critical concepts that define the peer review process, particularly for younger physician scientists in our field. A sustainable, constructive, and robust peer review process affirms the integrity and rigor that our authors deserve. A literature exists that defines components of an outstanding review of scholarly articles.2–5 The present commentary highlights process elements that are unique to JNIS.
How reviewers are chosenThe ScholarOne...
from # All Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis via alkiviadis.1961 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2Ag55Pq
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.